Legal Opinion

Furst v. Risse

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1930No. File No. 6653PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN,, P. J.

'Defendant Risse had been buying merchandise from plaintiffs under contract, the performance of which on his part was guaranteed by three persons. One of these guarantors desiring to be released, Risse enterd into a new contract with plaintiffs, the performance of which on his part was guaranteed by the defendants, Bruns, Denser and W'iedmann, the guaranty being written or printed on the same paper as the contract between Risse and plaintiffs, which was dated December 17, 1923, and accepted by plaintiffs at Freeport, Illinois, on January 14, 1924. The guaranty reads as follows:

“Fo…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. William Deering & Co. v. MortellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. WarrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. J. R. Watkins Co. v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. International Harvester Co. v. GraberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wakonda Independent Consolidated School District No. 1 v. McCulloughSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Boyd v. Deadwood Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2024
  5. J. R. Watkins Co. v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API