Legal Opinion

J. R. Watkins Co. v. Beyer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 29, 1930:

Foweee, J.

It is apparent that if Menning was the agent of the company in procuring defendant’s signature to the guaranty, the jury’s findings of representation by Menning that he was not indebted to plaintiff and reliance by the defendant on such representation without negligence on his part voids the contract of guaranty.

The contract in suit and many others very similar have been before the courts of several states. The contracts are cunningly devised to enable foreign corporations to evade the common statutory provisions requiring them to file…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saginaw Medicine Co. v. BateyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Dr. Koch Medical Tea Co. v. PoitrasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Furst v. RisseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. WarrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Onsrud v. PaulsenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Wakonda Independent Consolidated School District No. 1 v. McCulloughSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  4. J. R. Watkins Co. v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API