Legal Opinion

International Harvester Co. v. Graber

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1932No. File No. 7272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER QURIAM.

Graber Bros, of Bridgewater, S. D., desired to secure a contract to act as representatives of the International Harvester Company and to secure credit with said company. The company did not deem the Grabers financially responsible and was unwilling to extend credit to them. For the purpose of securing credit with and obtaining a .contract from the Interational Harvester Company, Graber Bros., not being then indebted to said company, nor representing said company (cf. Rawleigh Co. v. Warren, 47 S. D. 319, 198 N. W. 555; Furst v. Risse, 56 S. D. 418, 229 N. W. 293) procured defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. of New York v. HendersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Furst v. RisseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. WarrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wakonda Independent Consolidated School District No. 1 v. McCulloughSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Insurance Agents, Inc. v. ZimmermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Insurance Agents, Inc. v. ZimmermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API