Cynthia Schafer Uhiren v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc. A.K.A. Mead Johnson & Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NANGLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Cynthia Schafer Uhiren (“Uhi-ren”) appeals from the decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc. (“Bristol-Myers”) in Uhi-ren’s product liability claims arising out of her use of Stadol Nasal Spray (“Stadol”), a prescription pain medication manufactured and distributed by Bristol-Myers. We affirm.
I
The substantive and procedural facts relevant to this appeal follow. Uhiren suffered from chronic migraine headaches. In 1994, she was under the care of Dr. Mary Corbitt, a neurologist. Dr. Corbitt…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eugene Herring v. The Canada Life Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- James Bailey v. United AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- In Re Prempro Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Executive Air Taxi Corp. v. City of Bismarck, NDCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Terrie Elizabeth Ridpath Lon E. Ridpath v. Howard Lloyd Pederson the Lakin Law Firm, P.C. Ricky D. FoutchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Wilson v. GunnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Robinson v. White CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.