Legal Opinion

Jessup v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 18, 1882No. 43PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California. This was an action at law brought by the United States against William H. Jessup, as principal, and Jabez Howes and others, sureties on his bond, dated Nov. 3, 1869, payable to the United States, in the sum of $10,000, and conditioned, as follows: — - “The condition of the foregoing obligation¡il such, that whereas the said William Henry Jessup is a manufactufrfer of friction or other matches,…

Read the full summary

Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California. This was an action at law brought by the United States against William H. Jessup, as principal, and Jabez Howes and others, sureties on his bond, dated Nov. 3, 1869, payable to the United States, in the sum of $10,000, and conditioned, as follows: — - “The condition of the foregoing obligation¡il such, that whereas the said William Henry Jessup is a manufactufrfer of friction or other matches, cigar-lights, or wax-tapers; and wlMreas, under the provisions of the 161st section of an act enti||l|ed ‘ An Act to…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woods

The answer of the defendants admits the execution of the bond which is the basis of the suit. The finding by the court below in favor of the United States of all tiie issues of fact raised by the pleadings establishes, beyond the reach of contro-' versy, that Jessup did not perform the condition of his bond; that he did not pay for revenue stamps advanced to him; and that the United States, or^some of its officers, did not, without the knowledge or consent of his sureties, make a new contract, whereby credits for stamps furnished him were extended indefinitely, and beyond the term of sixty…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. United States v. TingeySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  4. United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1841

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Benson Mining & Smelting Co. v. Alta Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Moses v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. United States v. SolomonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Moffitt, Zwerling & Kemler, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Frank B. Killian CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API