Legal Opinion

Kilsheimer v. Rose & Moskowitz

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 17, 1958No. 25112_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

257 F.2d 242

James B. KILSHEIMER, III, and Jacob-Grumet, Grumet,

Receivers of the New York, Ontario and Western

Railway Company and subsidiary

companies, Appellees,

v.

ROSE & MOSKOWITZ, Sidney G. Rose and Philip L. Moskowitz, Appellants.

No. 370, Docket 25112.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued April 18, 1958.

Decided July 17, 1958.

Charles R. Taine, New York City (Franklin Feldman, Lewis G. Cole, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, New York City, on the brief), for appellants.

Robert L. Tofel, Asst. U.S. Atty., Southern District of New York, New York City (Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Roth v. HartlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. Randall v. DouglassMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Feldman v. American Palestine Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. Plimpton v. Mattakeunk Cabin Colony, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Co-Build Companies, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Refinery Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. Fletcher v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1967
  3. Balaber-Strauss v. Markowitz (In Re Frankel)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Securities And Exchange Commission v. Vision Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  5. Co-Build Companies, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Refinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API