Legal Opinion

Scoggins v. Moore

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided January 20, 1984No. Civ. A. C82-67RPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.

Two motions are presently before the Court in this case: the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 56. The motion to amend is denied because it is untimely and futile, and the motion for summary judgment is granted.

I. BACKGROUND

The plaintiffs are citizens of Bartow County, Georgia. The defendant, Frank Moore, is the sole County Commissioner for Bartow County. He is vested with the exclusive authority to issue retail malt-beverage licenses in this county. See GA.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bates v. Cook, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1984
  2. McCollum v. City of Powder Springs, Ga.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1989
  3. Durham v. Fleming Companies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Frank Cheek v. Glen Gooch, as Sole Commissioner, Union County, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Scoggins v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API