Legal Opinion

(PC) Sanders v. Grimes

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 1, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01285Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TROY ALEXANDER SANDERS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01285-AWI-JLT (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS CLAIMS AND DEFENDANT 13 v. AND TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO SEEK ONLY NOMINAL DAMAGES 14 GRIMES, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (Doc. 37) is before the Court for screening pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The Court finds that Plaintiff states cognizable claims against Defendants 19 Grimes and Lucas regarding his right to send mail to the courts.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API