Legal Opinion
Miller v. U.S. Department of Agriculture Farm Services Agency
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 17, 1998No. 97-6575PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
In this appeal, we determine, as a matter of first impression, whether a former employee of a county office of the United States Department of Agriculture Stabilization and Conservation Service (“ASCS”) can bring a Bivens action against the federal government officers responsible for his termination.1 On summary judgment, the district court ruled that alternate administrative remedies precluded plaintiff-appellant from maintaining a Bivens suit. We affirm.
*1414I. BACKGROUND
The Secretary of Agriculture (“the Secretary”) oversees three levels of “representative” committees…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Bush v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schweiker v. ChilickySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Franks v. NimmoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Santiago Alvarez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Big Cats of Serenity Springs, Inc. v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- In Re: Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa / Meskwaki Casino LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Damian Sinclair, Individually and as Assignee of Sinclair National Bank v. John D. Hawke, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- XP Vehicles, Inc. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.