In Re: Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa / Meskwaki Casino Litigation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
These consolidated appeals involve the intersection of an issue that is subject to federal regulation, namely, the operation of Class III gaming on Indian lands, with an issue that is subject to tribal control, namely, the right of a limited sovereign to interpret its own constitution and select its own leaders. As to the gaming issue, we affirm the district court’s grant of a preliminary injunction enforcing a temporary closure order from the Chairman of the National Indian Gaming Commission (the “NIGC”) and the district court’s dismissal of a premature challenge to the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- First Western Capital Management Co. v. MalamedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Federal Emergency Management AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Minard Run Oil Co. v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Sac & Fox Tribe v. Bureau of Indian AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Attorney's Process & Investigation Services, Inc. v. Sac & Fox TribeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.