Legal Opinion

Phenis v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 5, 2006No. 02-CF-536PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUIZ, Associate Judge:

Jamar Phenis1 was convicted of arson (D.C.Code § 22-401),2 malicious destruction of property (D.C.Code § 22-403),3 and second degree cruelty to children (D.C.Code § 22-901).4 He claims on appeal that the trial court should have sua sponte ordered a competency evaluation *142during trial; that the trial court erred in failing to conduct a Frendak5 inquiry; that the trial court improperly precluded him from defending against the specific intent element of arson; that there was error in the arson jury instruction; that the trial court erred when it corrected appellant’s illegal…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Farrell v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
  2. Gorbey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Hargraves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Higgenbottom v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. McNeil v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API