Legal Opinion

Bray v. Cohn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1907No. Civ. No. 417PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

A demurrer to the complaint upon the ground that this action was barred by the provisions of section 339, subdivision 1 thereof, of the Code of Civil Procedure, was sustained, without leave to amend, and thereafter judgment entered in favor of respondent. From said judgment this appeal is taken.

On the thirtieth day of January, 1899, the respondent, Cohn, executed and delivered to the Bank of British Columbia, at the city of San Francisco, his promissory note for the sum of $3,000, with interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum, said note being payable one day after date. At the request…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chipman v. Morill & WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Yule v. BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Crystal v. HuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wills v. WoolnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. Dodds v. SpringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Johnson v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Shinn v. KitchensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Manuel v. Hicks Iron WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API