Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Etzweiler

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 13, 1984No. 83-037; No. 83-088Published

1Dissent

King, C.J.,

dissenting in Etzweiler (with whom Douglas, J., joins in Part I) and concurring specially in Bailey: For the reasons that follow, I would affirm both sets of indictments against Etzweiler, as a principal to negligent homicide and as an accessory to negligent homicide. While I concur with the result of the majority opinion in Bailey, affirming the trial court’s denial of Bailey’s motion to dismiss, for the reasons set forth below, I disagree with the statutory analysis adopted by the majority. Thus, I reach the constitutional issues raised by Bailey.

A. Etzweiler

The superior court…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API