Legal Opinion

Barker v. Gottlieb

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided October 16, 2013No. Civil No. 13-00236 LEK-BMKPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, District Judge.

On August 5, 2013, Defendants Joshua L. Gottlieb, Jonathan Dubowsky, Donald Borneman, Charles Hall, Scott Harris, the Value Exchange Advisors, also known as/doing business as TVXA (“TVXA”), and GEMCo-Pacific Energy LLC, also known as GPE (“GPE,” all collectively “Defendants”) filed their Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (“Motion”). [Dkt. no. 19.] Pro se Plaintiff Charles Barker III (“Plaintiff’) filed his memorandum in opposition to the Motion on October 7, 2013.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Fleming v. PickardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barker v. GottliebDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2014
  2. Barker v. BSI Financial ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API