Legal Opinion
Barker v. Gottlieb
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided May 28, 2014No. Civil No. 13-00236 LEK-BMKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1155 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, District Judge.
On January 23, 2014, Defendants Joshua L. Gottlieb, Jonathan Dubowsky, Donald Borneman, Charles Hall, Scott Harris, the Value Exchange Advisors, doing business as TVXA (“TVXA”), and GEMCo-Pacific Energy LLC, also known as GPE (“GPE,” all collectively “Defendants”) filed their Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”). [Dkt. no. 59.] Pro se Plaintiff Charles Barker III (“Plaintiff’) filed two different documents titled “Plaintiffs Opposition to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Flynn v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2016
- Couto v. CorVel Enterprise Comp., Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 2025
- Selvin Ariel Chunux-Coc v. Tonya Andrews, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2026