Legal Opinion
St. Anthony Falls Water Power Co. v. St. Paul Water Comm'rs
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 29, 1897No. 28, 24PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
168 U.S. 349 (1897)
ST. ANTHONY FALLS WATER POWER COMPANY
v.
ST. PAUL WATER COMMISSIONERS.
MINNEAPOLIS MILL COMPANY
v.
SAME.
Nos. 28, 24.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 13, 14, 1897.
Decided November 29, 1897.
Mr. Rome G. Brown for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Charles S. Albert was on his brief.
Mr. James E. Markham and Mr. Herman W. Phillips for defendants in error.
Mr. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.
It is claimed upon the part of the plaintiffs in error that by the decision of the court below they have been deprived of their property without due…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Illinois Central Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Bonelli Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- State v. KorrerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.