Legal Opinion
Michael Valerio and Yung Hao Chang v. Boise Cascade Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 18, 1981No. 79-4264, 79-4241PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Per curiam
In May, 1973, the district court approved a class action settlement in McCubbrey v. Boise Cascade Home & Land Corporation, N.D.Cal., 71 F.R.D. 62. That litigation, arising out of the sale of recreational real properties by Boise Cascade, involved a class of 44,000 plaintiffs as well as the California Attorney General and several county district attorneys. Although Valer-io and Chang elected to participate in the settlement finally hammered out in that complex litigation, they now seek to overturn it and reopen the settled claims, and further seek recovery from the class attorneys including…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Pacific Railroad of Missouri v. Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. And Others. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Marshall v. Holiday Magic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. CoyneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Cresswell v. Sullivan & CromwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Gabrielson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Colleen Baer v. First Options of Chicago, Incorporated, Appeal of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, P.C. v. James R. AntonionoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.