Lewis River Golf, Inc. v. O.M. Scott & Sons

The main issue is narrow and essentially factual, i.e., should the testimony of plaintiff's damage expert have been stricken because it was speculative or not supported in the record? Secondary issues are whether, on retrial after the Court of Appeals granted a new trial limited to damages, the retrial violated the mandate as to the damages recoverable, and whether defendant has preserved two other issues raised in the Court of Appeals, and, if so, their resolution.

lb understand the present posture of these issues, it is necessary to state the history of this case. Plaintiff, Lewis River…