Legal Opinion

Bains Motor Co. v. Le Croy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 26, 1923No. 6 Div. 874PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, j.

Grady Le Croy, a minor suing by next friend, was struck and injured by an automobile then driven by Brice Bains. When injured, the child was walking in a public highway, following its mother. Count 1 of the complaint made parties defendant A. L., A. S., B. M., and W. T. B'ains, “partners in trade doing business under the firm name and style of Bains Motor Company.” Brice Bains, the driver, was not sued. Under the allegations of counts 1 and A the liability asserted was predicated of the averment that the car’s driver was the agent of all of the defendants jointly. Upon the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richardson v. . HughittNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Robinson & Co. v. GreeneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Couch v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  4. Tayloe v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Davies v. BarnesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Townsend v. AdairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Jones v. Northwestern Auto Supply Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Rooks v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Williams v. Roche Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. Hodges v. WellsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API