Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Adair

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 23, 1931No. 4 Div. 541PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The demurrers to the complaint are not argued in brief to the extent of pointing out the assignments relied on as constituting a defect. The court sustained demurrers to the special pleas of contributory negligence. We have heretofore in many cases stated that such pleas are not sufficient if they merely state a conclusion of law, but must aver the facts constituting the negligence, and that the facts so averred must be such as that the conclusion of negligence follows as a matter of law. Dwight Mfg. Co. v. Holmes, 198 Ala. 590, 73 So. 933; Smith v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 219 Ala. 676, 123 So. 57.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dwight Manufacturing Co. v. HolmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Cruse-Crawford Mfg. Co. v. RuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Government Street Lumber Co. v. OllingerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Toranto v. HattawaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. C. C. Snyder Cigar & Tobacco Co. v. StuttsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Shirley v. ShirleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Buffalo Rock Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Lynn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Utility Trailer Works v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  5. Williams v. Roche Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API