Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Wells

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 8, 1932No. 2 Div. 6PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Count 1 as originally filed and amended count 2, as appear in the record proper before us, present no case of the violation of the rule against uniting several distinct causes of action in one count, as urged by counsel. National Surety Co. v. Plemmons, 214 Ala. 596, 108 So. 514; Deason v. Gray, 192 Ala. 611, 69 So. 15; Id., 189 Ala. 672, 66 So. 646; Union Indemnity Co. v. Webster, 218 Ala. 468, 118 So. 794; Shirley v. McDonald, 220 Ala. 50, 124 So. 104. The general rule is stated in Graham v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 217 Ala. 658, 117 So. 286; Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Jackson v. VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Reaves v. MaybankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Auto Mut. Indemnity Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Utility Trailer Works v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Williams v. Roche Undertaking Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  5. LaHatte v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API