State v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegram Company
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Justice.
We are here confronted with litigation that has dragged its way through the processes of the Alabama Public Service Commission, the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, and the Supreme Court of Alabama for over eight years.
The interests of the rate payers, of the Southern Bell Telephone Company, and of the State of Alabama demand that' this liti gation be concluded. As observed by the trial court in its decree: “Thus for over six years since the Company filed its application for increased rates, this matter is still unsettled and in litigation. The public does not know what…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Mississippi Public Service CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. Alabama Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Hammond v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Alabama Gas Corporation v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- ALA. PUBLIC SERV. COM'N v. South Cent. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Zia Natural Gas Co. v. New Mexico Public Utility CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.