ASG Industries, Inc. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Judge.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the U.S. Customs Court, 82 Cust. Ct.1, C.D. 4782 (1979), which upheld the decision of the Secretary of the Treasury (“Secretary”) that float glass manufactured in West Germany did not benefit from the payment or *14bestowal of a bounty or grant witbin tbe meaning of section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1303). We reverse and remand.
Background
Appellants, domestic manufacturers and wholesalers of float glass, petitioned the Commissioner of Customs for imposition of a countervailing duty on float glass manufactured in West…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- G. S. Nicholas & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Downs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing Co., Inc. And the Procter & Gamble Company, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Saarstahl Ag v. United States v. Inland Steel Bar CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Carlisle Tire & Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Carlisle Tire and Rubber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.