Legal Opinion

Fenyn v. Fenyn

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided December 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Gorman,- J.

On motion for new trial.. This is an action to recover damages for slander of plaintiff by the defendant. The alleged defamatory words are actionable per se as they reflect on the chastity of the plaintiff, a woman. The petition sets forth the slanderous words, and avers that on the 11th day of November, 1908, in a certain discourse in the presence and hearing of divers persons the defendant maliciously spoke and published them of- and concerning the plaintiff.

At the trial- the defendant failed to appear, although he was represented by counsel' during the entire' trial, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guard v. RiskIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Marks v. JacobsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Kidder v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
  4. Marx v. Press Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Haag v. CooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. LeMayDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API