Haag v. Cooley
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Wilson District Court. ActioN for slander. At the May Term, 188°, plaintiff Cooley had judgment for $30 against defendant Haag, who brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action for slander, commenced by James Cooley against J. J. Haag. The case was tried before the court and a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor ■of the plaintiff and against the defendant for $30 and the costs of suit; and the defendant, as plaintiff in error, brings the case to this court, and alleges error in several particulars.
I. It is claimed that the court below erred in overruling the motion of the defendant below to require the plaintiff below to make his petition more definite and certain. The petition does not…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gray v. St. JohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Bissell v. CornellNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Bunnell v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854
- Harrington v. MilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Bisbey v. ShawNew York Supreme Court · 1853
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schulze v. CoykendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Mannix v. Portland TelegramOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- University of Kansas v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- State v. SchollSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
- Smith v. GillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.