Legal Opinion

Bartle v. Coleman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 12, 1821PublishedCited by 12 opinions

This cause was argued by Mr. Swann, for the plaintiff in error,a and by Mr. Jones, and Mr. Taylor, for the defendant in error.b

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall

This is a writ of error to a judgment rendered by the Circuit Court for the. District of Columbia aqd county of Alexandria, against Andrew Bartle and Samuel Bartle, on a writ issued by George Coleman against Andrew Bartle, on the service of which, Samuel Bartle became bail for his appearance. The defendant in the Court below not having entered his appearance, a conditional judgment was entered at the rules held in the clerk’s office, against the defendant and his appearance bail. This being an action on the case, the judgment at the rules was for no specific sum, but for the damages which thé…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. KnightIndiana Supreme Court · 1818
  2. (PC) Hendrix v. GomezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  3. (PS) Van den Heuvel v. CardulloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  4. Bellows v. StoneSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1846
  5. Epperson v. Codification Order 497District Court, E.D. California · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API