Legal Opinion

(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Cardullo

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 20, 2020No. 2:19-cv-00883Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN MARK VAN DEN HEUVEL No. 2:19-cv-0883 MCE DB PS A.K.A. JEAN MARC, 12 13 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 v. 15 EL DORADO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS, et al., 16 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff John Mark Van den Heuvel is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was 20 referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 21 Pending before the court are plaintiff’s amended complaint and motion to proceed in forma 22 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API