Legal Opinion

Epperson v. Codification Order 497

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 8, 2024No. 1:24-cv-01355Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRIS JONATHAN EPPERSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-01355-JLT-BAM 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND 13 v. (Doc. 1) 14 CODIFICATION ORDER 497, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Chris Jonathan Epperson (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 18 initiated this civil action on November 6, 2024. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff’s complaint is currently 19 before the Court for screening. 20 I. Screening Requirement and Standard 21 The Court screens complaints brought by persons…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API