Legal Opinion

Arizona State Tax Commission v. Ensign

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1953No. 5609PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

The Arizona State Tax Commission has appealed from an adverse judgment “reluctantly” entered by Judge Windes of the Superior Court of Maricopa County in a “suit for recovery of taxes illegally collected”. Such an action is provided for in Article II, Section 17, of the Excise Revenue' Act of 1935, now appearing as Section 73-1318, A.C.A.1939. The learned trial Judge considered himself bound by a previous decision of this court even though he thoroughly disagreed with the conclusion.

Appellees Ensign and Kempson, plaintiffs below, are partners engaged, among other things, in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Western Live Stock v. Bureau of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. McGoldrick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Norton Co. v. Department of Revenue of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. MealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Cooney v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Forster Shipbuilding Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Arizona State Tax Com'n v. Garrett CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Univar Corp. v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. City of Phoenix v. Arizona Sash, Door & Glass Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Advertiser Publishing Co. v. FaseHawaii Supreme Court · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API