Legal Opinion

Seymour v. New Bremen Speedway, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 1971No. 245PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.

Although the plaintiffs, appellants herein, assign numerous errors, most of them are directed at findings made by the court as a predicate for granting the motion made by defendants, appellees herein, at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence for a directed verdict. As we here consider these assignments of error, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and 10 are directed to the basic issue as to the correctness of the trial court’s decision in granting this motion. The other two issues or assignments of error are directed to the refusal of the trial court to grant plaintiffs’ leave to amend their petition in certain…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Roszman v. SammettOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Soles v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. French v. Special Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Hine v. Dayton Speedway Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Roeckner v. Pence Drag Strip, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Bowen v. Kil-Kare, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Holzer v. Dakota Speedway, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. LaFrenz v. Lake County Fair BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Dunn Ex Rel. Dunn v. Paducah International RacewayDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1984
  5. Smith v. Golden Triangle Raceway, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API