City of Everett v. Estate of Sumstad
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Dolliver, J. —
The City of Everett commenced an inter-pleader action against the seller (the Sumstad Estate) and the buyer (Al and Rosemary Mitchell) of a safe to determine who is entitled to a sum of money found in the safe. Both the Estate and the Mitchells moved for summary judgment. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Estate. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Everett v. Estate of Sumstad, 26 Wn. App. 742, 614 P.2d 1294 (1980).
Petitioners, Mr. and Mrs. Mitchell, are the proprietors of a small secondhand store. On August 12, 1978, the Mit-chells attended Alexander's…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hotchkiss v. National City Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911
- Plumbing Shop, Inc. v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Gaasland Co. v. Hyak Lumber & Millwork, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- West Coast Airlines, Inc. v. Miner's Aircraft & Engine Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni'sWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Wilson Court Ltd. Partnership v. Tony Maroni's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Avritt v. Reliastar Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.