Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. North Jersey Trust Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 24, 1966PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge:

Defendant Reynolds & Co. has made a motion for the following orders:

1. “For an order pursuant to Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing each and every claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and in the alternative dismissing and striking the spurious class action as insufficient in law.”

2. “For an order pursuant to Rule 12(b) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing the Third and Fourth Claim [s] for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.”

3. “For an order pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Robidoux v. CelaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Robidoux v. CelaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  4. Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API