Legal Opinion

Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults v. Pataki

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 2, 1996No. Civil A. CV-96-0288 (DGT)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TRAGER, District Judge:

This action was brought by four profoundly disabled and medically fragile adults, who have been institutionalized under joint State-local programs for many years, most recently under a program called Transitional Care Funding (TCF). The TCF program was developed to provide a bridge between educational placements of severely disabled persons in residential programs and long-term adult residential care after these persons became adults or, as it is called, “aged-out” of educational placements at the end of the school year in which they became…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Suffolk Parents of Handicapped Adults v. WingateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Westchester Advocates for Disabled Adults v. PatakiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  3. Suffolk Parents Of Handicapped Adults v. WingateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API