Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Magnano, A/K/A "Joe the Grind"

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 7, 1976No. 1011, 76-1058, 76-1062, 76-1064 and 76-1137PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-Appellants, asserting a host of alleged errors below, appeal from judgments of conviction for conspiring to traffic in narcotics and substantive violations of the narcotics laws. Only six of - appellants’ many arguments warrant discussion in this opinion. We have carefully considered each of the numerous claimed infirmities in their convictions and find none to be meritorious.

The facts adduced at trial evidenced a narcotics conspiracy network not dissimilar, except.perhaps in the quantities involved, from many such conspiracies this Court has been called- upon…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Three Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Dollars ($364,960.00) in United States CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. McGloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API