Rose v. City of Wichita

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This was an action for damages for personal injuries. The jury answered special questions and returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant has appealed, and contends that it is not liable to plaintiff in any sum.

*318The pertinent facts may be stated as follows: During the dry, hot part of the summer of 1936, as an extension of its parking and bathing facilities for its citizens, and particularly the children, defendant for a time operated sprinklers at sixteen different locations in the residence sections of the city. These were sent out by…