Legal Opinion
Twentier's Research, Inc., a Corporation, and Max Twentier v. Hollister Incorporated and the Firm of John Dickinson Schneider, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 1963No. 18423_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JERTBERG, Circuit Judge.
A suit for infringement was brought below by appellees, owner and assignee of the Schneider patent No. 2,954,620, for “identification means.” The individual defendant, Max Twentier, had been employed by appellee, The Firm of John Dickinson Schneider, Inc., in 1958 as its marketing manager. Subsequent to the termination of his employment with Schneider, Mr. Twentier created the other defendant, Twentier’s Research, Inc., which company began the manufacture and sale of the accused device. A second cause of action alleged that Max Twentier had unfairly competed with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kwikset Locks, Inc. v. Hillgren. Hillgren v. Kwikset Locks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Stearns v. Tinker & RasorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Photochart Photo Patrol, Inc. v. Photo Patrol, Inc. PhotochartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
3Cited by6 opinions
- McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1967
- RPTZ-Patco, Inc. v. Pacific Inland Navigation CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1966
- Ronson Corp. v. Maruman of California, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1963
- Carborundum Co. v. Wilbanks, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.