Legal Opinion

BEAL v. 3M COMPANY

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided February 18, 2022No. 7:20-cv-00006Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, Case No. 3:19-md-2885 Judge M. Casey Rodgers Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones This Document Relates to: Beal, 7:20-cv-00006 Kelley, 7:20-cv-00153 Vaughn, 7:20-cv-00134 Vilsmeyer, 7:20-cv-00113 Wilkerson, 7:20-cv-00035 ______________________________/ ORDER Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motions to Authorize Remote Testimony Pursuant to Rule 43(a) From Elliott Berger. Master Docket ECF No. 2679.1 Defendants have filed responses to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Vioxx Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API