State v. Wenberg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction of appellant for aggravated robbery. He was sentenced to 70 months consecutively. He raises issues related to his conviction as well as the propriety of the sentence.
ISSUES
1. Was there sufficient evidence presented at trial to sustain the conviction?
2. Was appellant denied effective assistance of counsel?
3. Did the court err in commenting in the presence of the jury that there is no alibi defense in this lawsuit?
4. Did the court err in sentencing appellant to a consecutive sentence of 70 months?
ANALYSIS
Insufficiency of the Evidence
Cred…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. CermakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. BeardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. EberhardtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. Al-NaseerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. GroverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.