Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 21, 2005No. 1040546PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

Bill Heard Chevrolet, Inc., and Chuck Berry petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its order allowing discovery and to enter an order compelling arbitration. We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Citizens Bank v. Alafabco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Sanders v. Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Murray v. Holiday Isle, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2009
  2. Ritter v. Grady Automotive Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Paw Paw's Camper City, Inc. v. HaymanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. Portersville Bay Oyster Co. v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
  5. Acosta v. Trinity BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API