Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Trinity Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 5, 2016No. 1140200PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BOLIN, Justice.

Sergio Acosta petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Geneva Circuit Court to vaeate its October 22, 2014, order granting a motion filed by Trinity Bank (hereinafter “the bank”) to strike Acosta’s jury demand with respect to all counts in Acosta’s counterclaim and third-party complaint in the bank’s action against him. We grant the petition and issue the writ.

*351 I. Facts and Procedural History

On April 19, 2013, the bank filed a complaint, seeking a judgment against Acosta for financial losses it incurred after Acosta defaulted on certain “Multipurpose Note and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Alfab, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  2. Ex Parte Finance America Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ex Parte GatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  4. Hunter-Benn Co. Company v. Bassett Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Mall, Inc. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Lincare Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API