Legal Opinion

Provost v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1985No. 51139-0PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

This appeal raises the issue whether the exclusive remedy provisions of the Washington workers' compensation act, RCW 51.04.010 and RCW 51.32.010, apply to bar an action brought by members of the employee's immediate family against an employer and a fellow employee for negligent infliction of emotional distress, loss of spousal consortium, and loss of parental consortium. We hold that the Washington workers' compensation law bars this type of suit against employers and fellow employees.

Facts

This lawsuit arises out of an accident which occurred on November 6, 1980. Roger Provost and William F.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Seattle-First National Bank v. Shoreline Concrete Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Peterick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Ash v. S. S. Mullen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Lundgren v. Whitney's Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Birklid v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Birklid v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Flanigan v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Corr v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hinman v. Yakima School District No. 7Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API