Legal Opinion · Dissent

State ex rel. Harrison v. Menaugh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1898No. 18,609Published

From the Whitley Circuit Court.

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Hackney, O. J.

I cannot concur in the conclusion of the majority of the court. I am fully convinced that the General Assembly, by the act of 1897, exercised a right expressly denied to it by the- constitution. The denial of authority is in these words: “The General Assembly shall not create any office the tenure of which shall be longer than four years.” Const. Sec. 2, Art. 15. This clause has frequently and *282properly been held to apply to the office, and not to the officer. Baker v. Kirk, 33 Ind. 517; Parmater v. State, ex rel., 102 Ind. 90; State, ex rel., v. Barlow, 103…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carson v. HarrisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Parmater v. State ex rel. DrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Perry v. ArringtonNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Baker v. KirkIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Fesler v. BraytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API