Smith v. Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.
Petitioner, an inmate at respondent Two Rivers Correctional Facility, challenges the temporary and permanent amendments to OAR 291-130-0016(3), in which the telephone service provider of respondent Department of Corrections (the department) is authorized to impose a “service fee” in the event that an inmate participates in a three-way call or any form of call forwarding. Petitioner also challenges the associated rule posted by the department’s telephone service provider, Telmate, which declares a fine of $25 for participating in call-forwarding or a three-way call. According to petitioner,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. Two Rivers Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Reid v. Department of Consumer & Business ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Smith v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Rivas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Smith v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. Dep't of Corr.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019