Legal Opinion

Gene A. Meadows v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1956No. 12553_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

Now, therefore, it is hereby ordered that the judgment be affirmed on the opinion of the district court, 140 F.Supp. 184, denying appellant’s motion to vacate and set aside his pleas, convictions, and sentences, without prejudice to the right of appellant to apply to the Director of the Bureau of Prisons for determination of his mental competency under Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 4245.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. MeadowsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Morris ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  2. Judson Broadus v. Dr. James v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  3. Harold Wayne Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  4. Virgil L. Handlon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  5. Bistram v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1959