Harold Wayne Davis v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant filed his motion, under Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, to vacate the sentence imposed on him by the District Court on the ground that he was insane at the time of the commission of the offense of kidnaping for which he was tried, and that he was also insane at the time of his trial. Appellant had never been adjudicated insane prior to the imposition of the sentence. The issue of insanity was raised for the first time upon the motion to vacate, in the District Court. See Bishop v. United States, 350 U.S. 961, 76 S.Ct. 440, 100 L.Ed. 835. The District Court held that the procedure that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bishop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Jonathan Gregori v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Judson Broadus v. Dr. James v. LowryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. MeadowsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Morris ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Van Buren Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
- Harold L. Mock v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.