Virgil L. Handlon v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CURIAM.
This appeal arises out of a denial of a motion to vacate sentence under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Defendant 1 was indicted for the crime of bank robbery under Title 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), and pleaded not guilty. The court of its own motion ordered that defendant be examined by a competent neurologist and later ordered that defendant be examined at the Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield, Missouri. The medical and psychiatric experts reported in substance that, while defendant was neurotic or partially psychopathic, he was legally sane, giving no evidence of delusions or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bishop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Hahn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- James Francis Hill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
- Dodd v. United States. Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gerald L. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Bistram v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1960
- Carl Jess Hanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Stone v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1960