Butte MacHinery Co. v. Carbonate Hill Milling Co.
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark
The complaint in this action states four causes of action, each of which is based upon a lease executed by the plaintiff to the defendant milling company, covering personal property consisting of mining machinery, at a stipulated monthly rental. Except as to the properties leased and the amount of rental reserved, the leases are identical, and, so far as necessary to be noted, are in the usual form of such instruments. To each of these leases there was appended a contract, signed by the defendant Whitworth, the material portions of which, except as to the amount therein named, read as follows:
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bull v. CoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Saint v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Adams v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. RaugstadMontana Supreme Court · 1922
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Gary Hay Grain Co., Inc. v. CarlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Weinberg v. Farmers State Bank of WordenMontana Supreme Court · 1988
- Morgen & Oswood Construction Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1975
- Baron v. BotsfordMontana Supreme Court · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.