Legal Opinion
State v. Blea
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1967No. 10754PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELLETT, Justice:
The defendant was tried, convicted, and sentenced for the crime of fraudulently obtaining a narcotic drug. The Information specified sub-section (4) of Section 58-13a-35, U.C.A.1953, as the basis for the charge. That section reads as follows:
No person shall obtain or attempt to obtain a narcotic drug, or procure or attempt to procure the administration of a narcotic drug, (1) by fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge; or (2) by the forgery or alteration of a prescription or of any written order; or (3) by the concealment of a material fact; or (4) by the use of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. KatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. DuboisUtah Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. OviedoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Thys Co. v. BrulotteWashington Supreme Court · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. FontanaUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ScottUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Robinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. DayUtah Supreme Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.