Legal Opinion

State v. St. John

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 13, 1976No. 59653PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, Judge.

Respondent’s application to transfer this cause from the Kansas City District of the Court of Appeals having been sustained, we consider the same “as on original appeal.” Mo.Const. Art. 5, Sec. 10.

Appellant was convicted of obtaining a controlled substance in violation of § 195.-250, RSMo 1969, which provides that: “It is unlawful for any person to obtain or attempt to obtain any controlled substance listed in Schedules III, IV or V or procure or attempt to procure the administration of the drug by the following means: (1) Fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge; or (2)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. KestersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  2. State v. SimoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Robinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Cronin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. HoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. McCutcheon v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API