Legal Opinion

Kentucky Cab Co. v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 21, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Rees

— Affirming.

The appellant, Kentucky Cab Company, a corporation authorized by its charter to engage in the taxicab, baggage transfer, and ambulance business, owns and operates a number of taxicabs in the city of Louisville. On December 19, 1928, the general council of the city of Louisville adopted an ordinance requiring owners and drivers of taxicabs to procure a permit or license before operating on the streets of the city, fixing the rate of fare that may be charged, and prescribing other regulations. Conceiving that the ordinance is illegal and void, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Weksler v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Reo Bus Lines Company v. Southern Bus Line CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Heartt v. Village of Downers GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Commonwealth v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jarrell v. Orlando Transit Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. McGill v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Earhart v. MiddendorfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. City of Louisville v. Louisville Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API